Pornography Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

porno - Essay ExampleHowever, when an individuals action causes or is believed to cause harm unto others, then his meetling freedom ends. His right to total independence ends where the right of others to the same kind of liberty begins. The very morsel an individual crosses the line that separates him from others, he loses his imperious liberty and must now comply with the rules and regulations imposed by society so that that all somebodys with liberty and freedom of thought and action may co-exist peacefully. These rules that prohibit indisputable actions or compel an individual to conduct himself within the prescribed manner are created not to deputise and diminish his liberties but to ensure that an individual, in the exercise of his liberties, does not cause harm unto others. Aptly, the formula of self-defense shall only be applicable to matters which involve the society and the individual. Society may only forbid or coerce an individual if the reason is to prevent him f rom harming others and nothing else. II. Mill cites other reasons to bawl out, or reason, with someone that do not justify compelling him. What are these? Under the principle of self-protection, the one and only reason to compel and control an individual against his will is to prevent him from causing harm unto others. ... These rules, according to John Stuart Mill are reasons to remonstrate an individual but do not justify compulsion. At most, other may only argue, bend or plead with him to heed their advice but in no way shall he be compelled and coerced to obey. By the same breath, compelling a person to give up his absolute liberty over his get self on the argument that it is the right thing for him to do is also unjustified and does not virtuousness obedience. Neither does an individuals own happiness nor his own well-being serve as reasonable grounds that justify compulsion. Society may not impose its opinion on very indispensable matters such as happiness and comfort upo n an individual and in the process infringe upon his right to absolute liberty insofar as his own life is concerned. The key phrase here, therefore, is harm to others. For as great as a person does not and is not going to harm others, then the most that others disregard do is remonstrate with him but can never justifiably compel him. III. Are there each positive actions that benefit others that Mill thinks the state can at least sometimes compel us to do? The general rule is that a person may only be restrained or compelled for the sole purpose of preventing him from committing harm unto others. However, this rule is not absolute. John Stuart Mill recognizes some exception to the principle of self-protection. These exceptions exist on the basis that a persons failure or refusal to act when it is his barter to do so may also be the cause of harm unto others. Actually, we can also pledge it as just a restatement of the general rule. To prevent harm and to benefit others in societ y, a person may be compelled to do certain acts even if it is against his will.